Introduction
The determination of uranium by the gravimetric technique is widely used in the industry. In our experience it is the most precise and easiest to use method for the determination of uranium.
Theory
Pre weighed uranium dioxide samples are oxidized to U3O8 in air at 900o ± 25o C. The method is not specific for uranium and corrections must be made for impurities. Differences in atomic weights also require corrections. The basic chemical reaction that takes place is
900oC
3UO2 + O2 → U3O8
U3O8 is a stoichiometric compound and the percent uranium can be calculated by using the appropriate gravimetric factors and correction.
Equipment needed
- Analytical balance
- Platner mortar
Crucibles, quartz or platinum
Desiccator
Procedure
Figure 1 lists the basic, analytical steps in this technique. The procedure is simple and utilities basic good laboratory practices, as required by any accurate gravimetric technique.
Calculations
Figure 2 shows the basic calculations used in this analysis. You will not that the weight of the ignited sample is corrected for the weight of nonvolatile impurity oxides to give the true weight of U3O8.
|
|
Fig.1 Basic analytical steps
| FORMULA
%U = F{W2-(W2xImx10-6)} x 100
WHERE
F = 3 x ATOMIC WT URANIUM
W2 = WEIGHT U3O8 AFTER IGNITION
O/U RATIO = MOLE OXYGEN / MOLE URANIUM |
ig 2. calculations
Impurity corrections. Nonvolatile impurities in the UO2 will be converted to higher oxides during the ignition step. The impurity content of each element is determined, usually by emission spectroscopy. Appropriate factors are applied to convert the weight of the elements oxide before ignition to the weight of the ignited sample U3O8. This is important step for accurate work. The effect of not correcting for impurities is shown in Fig.3 For the sake of this discussion, assume a UO2 sample has only iron as an impurity at the concentration shown. During reduction to UO2, the iron is present as FeO. During oxidation, it is converted to Fe2O3. If no correction are mede for this impurity, the error will be as shown with the results being reported high. It is obvious that at higher levels, the bias becomes significant.
Isotopic Corrections. A smaller bias can be introduced if corrections are not made for differences in atomic weight caused by differences in enrichment or 235U content. Figure 4 shows the errors that will be introduced if the gravimetric factor is based upon the atomic weight of natural uranium-commonly called a reference book factor. In this figure, it is assumed there is no 236U and the 234U remains constant over the range of 235U contents shown. In actual practice, this would not be the case, however, for the sake of illustration, it is acceptable. Note thet the errors are listed as percent from natural and olmost all are negative values. The negative value will result in a positive bias. Positive values will result in a negative bias.
Iam sorry is not shown of Fig.3 and Fig.4
Literature
Sharkey R.W.,”Analytical Method Used at Model Facillity”, ABB Combostion Engineering, Hematite.
ASTM C-696 paragraphs 16-22.

No comments:
Post a Comment